PORTAL RASMI
JABATAN PERDANA MENTERI
AGENSI PENGURUSAN BENCANA NEGARA

Program dan Aktiviti

Thunderstorm warning for seven states, KL until 5pm

KUALA LUMPUR: The Malaysian Meteorological Department (MetMalaysia) has issued a thunderstorm warning for seven states and Kuala Lumpur, with heavy rain, strong winds and lightning expected until 5pm.

In a statement issued at 2.30pm, MetMalaysia said the affected areas include Kedah, with warnings for Kota Setar, Pokok Sena, Padang Terap, Yan, Pendang, Kuala Muda, Sik, Baling, Kulim and Bandar Baharu.

In Perak, the warning covers Hulu Perak, Kuala Kangsar, Kinta, Perak Tengah, Kampar, Bagan Datuk, Hilir Perak, Batang Padang and Muallim.

In Pahang, thunderstorms are forecast in Cameron Highlands, Lipis and Raub.

The alert also applies to parts of Selangor, including Kuala Selangor, Klang, Gombak, Petaling and Hulu Langat.

 

The Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur is under the same weather warning.

In Johor, the affected areas are Kluang, Mersing, Kulai, Kota Tinggi and Johor Baru.

Sarawak is expected to be hit in Mukah, Bintulu and parts of Miri, namely the districts of Subis, Beluru, Miri and Marudi.

In Sabah, Telupid, Beluran and Sandakan are forecast to experience severe weather.

MetMalaysia said the warning was triggered by signs of thunderstorm activity with rainfall intensity exceeding 20mm per hour, currently occurring or expected to continue for over an hour.

It added that thunderstorm warnings are short-term alerts, valid for up to six hours after issuance.

Hujan lebat di 8 negeri petang ini

PETALING JAYA – Jabatan Meteorologi (MetMalaysia) mengeluarkan amaran ribut petir, susulan jangkaan hujan lebat berserta ribut petir dan angin kencang di lapan negeri sehingga pukul 5 petang ini.

MetMalaysia dalam satu hantaran memaklumkan, cuaca buruk itu dilaporkan melanda Kedah (Kota Setar, Pokok Sena, Padang Terap, Yan, Pendang, Kuala Muda, Sik, Baling, Kulim dan Bandar Baharu).

“Di Perak melibatkan daerah Hulu Perak, Kuala Kangsar, Kinta, Perak Tengah, Kampar, Bagan Datuk, Hilir Perak, Batang Padang dan Muallim.

“Huja lebat turut melanda Pahang (Tanah Tinggi Cameron, Lipis dan Raub), serta Selangor (Kuala Selangor, Klang, Gombak, Petaling dan Hulu Langat),” lapor MetMalaysia.

Sementara itu, di Johor pula antara kawasan yang dijangka terjejas adalah daerah Kluang, Mersing, Kulai, Kota Tinggi dan Johor Bahru.

“Selain itu, di negeri Sarawak, keadaan sama tertumpu sekitar Mukah, Bintulu dan Miri (Subis, Beluru, Miri dan Marudi), manakala, di Sabah pula melibatkan Sandakan (Telupid, Beluran dan Sandakan),” kata MetMalaysia. – KOSMO! ONLINE

Aktiviti kuari dipantau ketat, tiada bukti kait gegaran - Polis

IPOH – Setiap aktiviti letupan kuari di negeri ini dipantau secara ketat bagi memastikan ia dijalankan mengikut prosedur serta jadual kelulusan yang ditetapkan, kata Ketua Polis Perak, Datuk Noor Hisam Nordin.

Beliau berkata, pemantauan tersebut merangkumi semakan terhadap bahan letupan berjadual yang digunakan serta rekod penggunaan dan penyimpanan stok bahan letupan.

“Setakat ini, kesemua syarikat kuari berlesen yang diperiksa mematuhi syarat lesen dan prosedur operasi standard (SOP) yang ditetapkan.

“Aktiviti letupan juga dijalankan mengikut peraturan, jadual dan kelulusan yang sah. Tiada sebarang unsur keraguan dikesan setakat ini,” katanya kepada pemberita sempena Majlis Pemakaian Pangkat Pegawai Kanan Polis dan Serah Terima Tugas di Mes Pegawai Kanan Polis Perak, di sini, pada Rabu.

 

Beliau berkata, perkara itu sekali gus menolak dakwaan bahawa gegaran yang berlaku di sekitar Ipoh pada 18 Jun lalu berpunca daripada operasi kuari.

Menurutnya, hasil semakan dan siasatan awal mendapati semua aktiviti letupan oleh syarikat kuari berlesen hanya dijalankan pada waktu petang, iaitu selepas jam 12 tengah hari.

“Letupan oleh pihak kuari yang direkodkan pada hari tersebut berlaku sekitar jam 12 tengah hari, 1 petang dan paling lewat pada jam 4.08 petang.

“Sedangkan kejadian gegaran yang dilaporkan orang awam berlaku seawal jam 10.30 pagi. Jadi agak mustahil ia berpunca daripada letupan kuari kerana waktu kejadian adalah berbeza,” jelasnya.

Noor Hisam berkata, siasatan lanjut berkaitan kes gegaran itu masih dijalankan dengan kerjasama pakar geologi dari Jabatan Mineral dan Geosains (JMG) bagi mengenal pasti punca sebenar.

“Kita sedang mengumpulkan beberapa bukti dan dapatan daripada kedua-dua pihak yang masih menjalankan siasatan.

“Setakat ini, tiada gegaran susulan dilaporkan dan saya menyeru masyarakat agar bertenang serta memberi ruang kepada pihak berkuasa untuk menjalankan siasatan secara menyeluruh,” katanya lagi.

Media sebelum ini melaporkan bunyi letupan dan gegaran kuat dirasai di beberapa kawasan sekitar Klebang, Chemor, Meru Raya, Ulu Kinta, Tanjung Rambutan dan Taman Ipoh.

Untuk rekod, pada 21 Oktober tahun lalu, satu gegaran kuat turut dilaporkan berlaku di sekitar Ipoh kira-kira jam 11 pagi, disusuli bunyi dentuman yang kuat.

Difahamkan, kejadian tersebut merupakan insiden keempat selepas kali pertama direkodkan pada Jun 2012 dan 4 Oktober 2018, dengan kesemuanya berlaku pada waktu hampir sama dan punca sebenar masih belum dikenal pasti sehingga kini.

Putra Heights explosion: blame the silly soil – Andrew Sia

Veteran journalist writes that one of Malaysia’s biggest industrial disasters may be heading the way of 1MDB — with zero human fault and plenty of unanswered questions

SO, the Putra Heights gas pipe explosion was due to an “Act of God”, sorry, I mean an “Act of Soil”.

No politicians or developers were at fault, even though there was digging work for a construction project near the pipe.

Selangor Menteri Besar Amirudin Shari revealed on June 30 that soil subsidence had happened since the Petronas gas pipeline was laid in 2000, causing it to sink by 15.9cm.

This damaged the pipe leading to the gas leak and fire. So was the MB indirectly pointing the finger at Petronas for not maintaining the pipe properly in those 25 years?

Yet Selangor police chief Hussein Omar Khan declared there was no negligence, no sabotage and no mischief. Did that clear Petronas?

So, we have yet another mysterious Malaysian disaster with ZERO human involvement.. Let’s all blame the silent soil that can’t speak!

I read many funny and sarcastic comments online about the “real cause” of the tragedy. Here are some:

“Maybe the earthworms wrongly hit the gas pipe.”

“Bring the soil to court!!”

“Even the foreign grass cutters would have noticed if the soil was sinking.”

Only in Malaysia.

  1. Floods – blame too much rain.
  2. Landslides – blame rain and weak soil.
  3. Gas pipe explosion – blame the soil!

1MDB repeated?

It’s like 1MDB all over again — a great crime with “no criminals”, as local authorities initially proclaimed.

And now we have Malaysia’s biggest industrial disaster – with no human fault.

The only difference is that this is happening under a Madani, not Barisan Nasional government.

On April 1, the fire from the Petronas gas pipeline saw flames shooting over 30m into the air, with temperatures reaching 1,000 degrees Celsius.

The surroundings became a hellfire landscape with 162 houses severely or partially damaged.

So who is going to compensate residents for the damage and hardship? The soil?

The Department of Occupational Safety and Health Department (DOSH) said the gas pipe met technical specifications but was not fully supported by the soil around it. This caused a weakness in the welded joint which then broke apart.

The Minerals and Geosciences Department had also found that the pipe was located in “waterlogged soil” which became loose, causing the pipe to sink.

But something doesn’t smell right. Even if soil is waterlogged, why would it move when it’s not on a slope but deep underground? No landslides or sinking land was reported there.

I’m sorry to say this, but blaming “water in soil” is like saying “heavy rain from the heavens” caused the explosion.

This sounds like the ”Act of God” excuse that the late Samy Vellu used when there were disasters.

The DOSH finding is very alarming because Petronas has 2,623km of gas pipelines supplying power and petrochemical plants plus other factories across Peninsular Malaysia.

Since our country has heavy rains, how many pipes are in “waterlogged” soil?

The Cilisos portal traced Petronas gas pipes online and the map shows that they pass areas of coastal Selangor that were once peat swamps, now drained for padi fields. These soils become “waterlogged” in downpours.

Cilisos also found many housing areas next to gas pipes – some without the required 30m “buffer zone”.

Does Petronas need to stop transporting gas until every inch of pipeline is inspected and certified safe?

Or should all residents living near such pipes sell their homes to avoid getting burnt alive?

Is Petronas guilty?

DAP Puchong MP Yeo Bee Yin now says that Petronas is still liable for the disaster, even though ground instability was found to be ”the cause”.

Yeo, a former oil and gas field engineer, says Petronas is responsible for ensuring its assets are in good condition.
and should compensate those affected by the fire.

But there is one problem here – the Selangor police chief has already announced there was NO negligence, sabotage nor mischief. So how can Petronas be liable?

Yet all these years before the Putra Heights disaster, there have been no explosions on over 2,000km of gas pipes, even though some surely pass through “waterlogged” soil.

According to an expert familiar with pipeline safety, Petronas actually has a decent safety record.

“Gas pipelines are very robust and hard to damage. They have gauges at every junction.”

“If there is a leakage, this will trigger an alarm at the central command centre,” explained the expert.

“The pipe is monitored by Petronas with sound and pressure sensors. But the gas leak and ignition may have happened too fast before action could be taken.”

The shops and excavator

So what could have caused such a sudden gas leak? Shortly after the explosion, many netizens pointed to the building of shop lots near the accident site.

In response, Subang Jaya mayor Amirul Azizan Abd Rahim told The Star that the shop development was legally sanctioned back in 2022.

This included approvals to utilise the Petronas Right-of-Way (ROW) over the pipeline area. The contractor was also on an approved panel said the mayor.

But we may have a “smoking gun” clue to this great mystery, a big metal suspect. This is the infamous excavator at the site.

Menteri Besar Datuk Seri Amirudin Shaari initially said no excavators were found there. But he was forced to U-turn on this, claiming he was “misunderstood”.

He also denied that he was trying to “protect” certain developers.

This was after police chief Hussein confirmed in early April that excavation work for a sewage pipe was done 30m from the site, but said police would need two more weeks to investigate if this had caused the blast.

He promised the public then, “No one will escape, and every party involved will be investigated.”

Yet a few days later on April 7, Hussein was quoted by The Rakyat Post that there was “no need to reveal the contractor’s identity at this stage.”

According to police statements, the contractor “followed all standard operating procedures”, including maintaining the approved 2.1-meter depth limit for the sewage pipe installation.

Yet investigations were ongoing then, so how did the police know that excavation SOP had been followed?

On April 29, Hussein announced that this notorious excavator had been located buried using ground penetrating radar.

And now, three months after the tragedy, when the soil is being blamed, the excavation contractor has STILL not been publicly revealed.

The pipe safety expert commented, “The soil subsided because digging was not supervised properly.”

“The same amount of soil extracted must be replaced with the same amount of soil filled..Otherwise the soil will subside. It’s basic soil mechanics.”

So what’s the conclusion? Unfortunately it’s to blame the stupid soil for not staying still. Blame the wicked water in the soil.

Because humans are beyond blame when it comes to mysterious Malaysian disasters. – July 2, 2025

***Andrew Sia is a veteran journalist with 25 years of experience in the media industry

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Call for independent probe into Petronas over blast

PETALING JAYA: Environmental watchdog RimbaWatch has urged the Selangor government to launch an independent inquiry into Petronas Gas Berhad and several government agencies following the April 1 gas pipeline explosion in Putra Heights, which injured 145 people and damaged over 200 homes.

The call comes after a report by the Occupational Safety and Health Department concluded that the blast was caused by unstable soil and groundwater accumulation, leading to 24.3cm of soil subsidence over 25 years. The report, released on Monday, found no evidence of negligence.

RimbaWatch has challenged this conclusion, arguing that Malaysian law defines negligence as the failure to exercise reasonable care, particularly when such failure results in harm.

“Given this definition, a number of questions remain unanswered,” the group said in a statement.

Citing the Petroleum (Safety Measures) Act 1984 and Gas Supply Act 1993, RimbaWatch stressed that pipeline operators may bear civil or criminal liability if faults in design, monitoring or maintenance are found.

It said Petronas has consistently promoted its pipeline infrastructure as long-lasting and monitored using advanced systems, including aerial and ground patrols, and real-time technologies such as Scada and PiriGIS.

Given these capabilities, RimbaWatch questioned how such significant soil movement went unnoticed.

It pointed out that environmental impact assessments (EIA) have been mandatory since 1988 and questioned whether the original EIA for the pipeline, laid in 2000, adequately accounted for long-term geological risks, such as groundwater buildup and subsidence.

“Who approved the EIA and who was responsible for monitoring its implementation over the years?”

It also highlighted a history of pipeline failures, particularly the Sabah-Sarawak Gas Pipeline, which has reportedly experienced explosions and leaks since 2014 and was decommissioned earlier this year due to persistent maintenance problems.

“This raises serious doubts about whether Petronas has put in place more stringent monitoring of high-risk pipeline sections, particularly after its experience with the Sabah-Sarawak Gas Pipeline.”

RimbaWatch also called for scrutiny of government agencies involved in land-use planning, questioning how approval was given to build dense housing near a major gas pipeline.

The organisation warned that framing the disaster as purely environmental, with no accountability assigned, reflects a broader trend in Malaysia’s response to environmental disasters.

It cited the 2022 Kampung Iboi floods and Batang Kali landslide as examples in which systemic accountability was lacking.

To underscore its point, RimbaWatch referred to the 2018 Revolution Pipeline explosion in Pennsylvania, which was similarly triggered by a landslide but resulted in nine criminal charges and a US$30 million (RM125.82 million) fine for the operator.

“We call for the Selangor government to commission an independent investigation, supported by local, regional and international experts in engineering, health and safety, geology, and law, to address these critical questions and uphold economic and environmental justice for the residents of Putra Heights,” it said.

RimbaWatch stressed that such a probe must be independent, warning that fossil fuel companies and regulators should not be allowed to escape potential responsibility for a disaster of this magnitude.

At a press conference on Monday, Selangor Menteri Besar Datuk Seri Amirudin Shari said investigations into the gas pipeline explosion at Putra Heights concluded that the incident was not caused by sabotage or negligence but rather by long-term ground subsidence.

He also said police found no evidence of sabotage or negligence contributing to the incident.

The investigation was led by the Occupational Safety and Health Department, alongside the Minerals and Geoscience Department, Public Works Department, Fire and Rescue Department and police.

 

 

 

Penafian
Kerajaan Malaysia dan Agensi Pengurusan Bencana Negara (NADMA) tidak bertanggungjawab di atas kehilangan atau kerosakan disebabkan penggunaan mana-mana maklumat yang diperolehi daripada laman web ini.
Hubungi Kami
Agensi Pengurusan Bencana Negara (NADMA),
Jabatan Perdana Menteri,
Aras B1, 6 dan 7, Setia Perkasa 5,
Kompleks Setia Perkasa,
Pusat Pentadbiran Kerajaan Persekutuan,
62502 WP Putrajaya

T: +603 8870 4800
F: +603 8870 4848
E: admin@nadma.gov.my
G: 2.937323, 101.704762
Statistik Pengunjung

Search