PORTAL RASMI
JABATAN PERDANA MENTERI
AGENSI PENGURUSAN BENCANA NEGARA

Berita

Is the Philippines ready for Super El Niño and super-typhoons?

This is not some doomsday forecast; this is actually possible.

A Super El Niño is coming to the Philippines, with its peak to happen in the final quarter of 2026. And given the pattern observed in the past few years, this will coincide with the time of the year when super-typhoons are likely to hit as well.

​Think back to recent instances of climate extremes hitting right after the other — from two years ago, when the nation was ravaged by six storms in a span of four weeks, or just last year, when typhoons Kalmaegi (Tino) and Fungwong (Uwan) struck a few days from each other.

​Is the Philippine government ready for this potential period of “super” disasters?​

History says no. Whether from the last Super El Niño of 2015-16 or the last El Niño of 2023-24, similar issues in government response worsened the plight of many communities, especially in the agricultural sector.

First is the slow mobilisation of interventions. The disbursement of insurance payouts, cash transfers, and other support was slowed by bureaucratic hurdles, which contributed to the infamous Kidapawan protests in 2016 that ended in violence. Poorer municipalities also lacked the necessary facilities and personnel to move and urgently distribute it to remote villages.

​Second is the government’s macro-scale focus on localised realities. Advisories on weather conditions and water reservoir levels did not account for conditions at the municipality level. As the government continues to heavily import crops such as rice to address food insecurity, local farmers are burdened by both direct damage to their livelihoods and cheaper competition from these imports.

On the other end of climate extremes, the unprecedented barrage of storms not only resulted in massive losses in agriculture but also billions of pesos worth of houses and other infrastructure. Familiar scenes of thousands in evacuation shelters and entire communities being flooded dominated headlines for weeks, even more so when there is virtually no time to recover from the last typhoon.

​Just as importantly, this episode introduced to many Filipinos the reality of compounding risks, putting a cruel twist to the notion of the whole being greater than the sum of its parts. It shattered any perception that storm-induced disasters happen only every once in a while. It further gave millions of people a first-hand preview of what happens if the climate crisis is not properly addressed in this vulnerable nation.  

“Longer” Christmas season

The Philippines is known for having the longest Christmas season in the world, but with these incoming climate extremes, it will feel even longer — and not in a good way. Towards its final quarter, there is a chance of a community experiencing droughts one day, then a supertyphoon a day or two after.

​So many questions remain to be properly answered by the Marcos Jr. administration.

​Is the nearly P40 billion (US$648,000) budget of the National Disaster Risk Reduction Management Fund going to be enough?

​Will the Local Disaster Risk Reduction Management Fund (LDRRM) Funds and Quick Response Funds of national agencies be properly and timely used?

​Will some of this year’s P250 billion budget (US$4.04 billion) on flood control help to address both of these extremes — assuming they do not go to the pockets of corrupt officials?

​With all due respect to the President, a “semi-permanent disaster response” system is insufficient for the current context. While response measures are necessary, they only perpetuate the prioritisation of a reactive culture in climate and disaster governance, which has proven ineffective in managing crises and conveniently ignores the root causes of these problems.

​After also uttering that strong storms should no longer be treated as an emergency, we can only hope his administration has the right approach and attitude heading into this season of potential super-disasters.

​On one hand, the government must ramp up its longer-term adaptation projects to build genuine climate resilience in vulnerable communities.

​This involves implementing the actions specified in the country’s National Adaptation Plan (NAP) for different climate hazards.

​For example, to address the impacts of droughts from future strong El Niño episodes, more investment must be secured to establish facilities to preserve harvests, roll out solar-powered irrigation systems, and restore natural watersheds to benefit and protect agricultural communities.

​Nonetheless, it cannot be emphasised enough the need to avoid, as much as possible, securing forms of finance that add to either the still-rising national debt or the burden on farmers and other climate-vulnerable sectors. It would also help the Philippines to have a clearer estimate of the costs of implementing its NAP, which it still does not have to this day.

Anticipate, not recreate

On the other hand, while the government has implemented certain solutions, there is an urgent need for even more actionable strategies to address the incoming impacts of these climate extremes.

​First, implement anticipatory actions rather than largely responsive ones, including through the implementation of Republic Act 12287, or the “State of Imminent Disasters Act”.

​Under this law, local government heads can now declare a state based on science-based pre-disaster risk assessments, giving them a bit more time to prepare before the onset of the peak of the drought or extreme rainfall. It also enables triggering emergency cash transfers to communities under threat and more urgently executing contingency plans to minimise damage to agricultural facilities.

​Second, set up water harvesting systems that can withstand both extreme events. Setting up small reservoir irrigation systems and large-scale rainwater harvesting networks could be challenging if a typhoon or super-typhoon also strikes the area; this requires technical support for low-cost, resilient engineering and strategic partnerships across sectors to accomplish this.

​Third, maximise all available funds and resources, upholding the strictest standards of transparency and accountability at all times. For example, many local government units (LGUs) did not fully or properly utilise their respective LDRRM in the past.

​Along with proper local coordination and the political will of subnational leaders, agencies such as the Department of Interior and Local Government, the Department of Agriculture, and LDRRM Councils must provide guidance to LGUs to ensure they use their respective funds properly to prepare for and address these incoming hazards.

​From the decision-makers to every citizen, we must remember that there is no such thing as a natural disaster. Disasters happen when there is a significant failure to fully address risks, especially compounding ones that would become more common and more challenging to address in the era of the climate crisis.

​We will find out if our national and local leaders have learned from the mistakes of the past decade. In the era of the climate emergency, there must be urgency.

John Leo Algo is national coordinator of Aksyon Klima Pilipinas, a nonprofit network of 40 civil society organisations like Greenpeace Philippines, WWF Philippines, and the Manila Observatory.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kerajaan Thailand mohon bantuan Jepun laksana 4 projek pengurusan air

BANGKOK: Thailand memohon sokongan Jepun bagi melaksanakan empat projek pengurusan air berskala besar, dengan Tokyo menunjukkan minat khusus terhadap inisiatif tebatan banjir di lembangan Sungai Chao Phraya dan Hat Yai.

Timbalan Perdana Menteri, Songsak Thongsri, mendedahkan perkara itu selepas mengadakan rundingan bersama Duta Besar Jepun ke Thailand, Masato Otaka di Rumah Kerajaan, pada Rabu.

Beliau menegaskan isu pengurusan air dan pencegahan banjir menjadi agenda utama dalam perbincangan berkenaan.

Menurut Songsak, kerajaan Jepun serta Agensi Kerjasama Antarabangsa Jepun (JICA) sudah lama memberi keutamaan kepada aspek pengurusan air dan sentiasa menjadi rakan rapat dalam membantu Thailand memperkukuh keupayaan tebatan banjir negara itu.

Jepun sebelum ini pernah menyediakan bantuan teknikal dan khidmat nasihat susulan bencana banjir besar yang melanda Thailand pada 2011, selain menyalurkan sokongan serupa selepas kejadian banjir di Hat Yai pada tahun lalu.

Kedua-dua pihak bersetuju mengenai keperluan pendekatan yang lebih sistematik bagi menangani cabaran berkaitan air. Sehubungan itu, Thailand mengemukakan empat projek kerjasama teknikal kepada JICA untuk dipertimbangkan.

Projek terbabit merangkumi sistem sokongan keputusan bagi sub-lembangan U-Tapao, pembangunan sistem zon air dan pengurusan dataran banjir untuk lembangan Chao Phraya, projek penggunaan teknologi canggih bagi menilai pengumpulan enapan di muara Sungai Chao Phraya, serta platform penyertaan awam bagi pengurusan air. - AGENSI

 

Air pasang besar ancam pesisir Pontian, penduduk diminta waspada

PONTIAN – Penduduk di kawasan pesisir pantai Pontian diminta meningkatkan tahap kewaspadaan susulan fenomena air pasang besar yang mula melanda daerah ini sejak malam tadi dan dijangka berterusan sehingga 17 Julai.

Fenomena air pasang setinggi antara 3.5 hingga 3.6 meter itu berpotensi menyebabkan kawasan rendah berhampiran pantai dinaiki air, terutama jika berlaku hujan lebat serentak.

Ketua Balai Bomba dan Penyelamat Pontian Baharu, Penolong Penguasa Bomba (PPgB) Mahadir Mamat berkata, bacaan air pasang direkodkan setinggi 3.5 meter pada 14 Julai, meningkat kepada 3.6 meter hari ini sebelum kembali kepada 3.5 meter pada 17 Julai.

“Apabila paras air melepasi 3.5 meter, kawasan yang mempunyai benteng atau penahan ombak berisiko dilimpahi air sebelum memasuki kawasan daratan.

“Antara lokasi yang dikenal pasti berisiko ialah Tanjung Piai, Kukup Laut, Pusat Perdagangan Pontian (PPP) serta bandar Benut,” katanya ketika ditemui selepas melakukan pemantauan di kawasan pesisir pantai PPP atau Tambak Pontian, tengah malam tadi.

Beliau berkata, seramai 12 anggota bomba terbabit dalam operasi pemantauan selain memberi nasihat kepada orang ramai yang memancing di kawasan berkenaan supaya sentiasa berwaspada sepanjang fenomena air pasang besar berlaku.

Katanya, orang ramai disaran segera meninggalkan kawasan pantai sekiranya paras air mula meningkat serta pihaknya turut mengenal pasti enam hingga lapan kawasan ‘hot spot’ yang berpotensi mengalami banjir sekiranya air pasang besar. – KOSMO! ONLINE

 

Sidang DUN Melaka : Banjir berlarutan 30 tahun, 22 hot spot telah diselesaikan

MELAKA – Jumlah hot spot banjir di Melaka berjaya dikurangkan daripada 124 kepada 102 lokasi hasil pelaksanaan pelbagai projek tebatan banjir, penyelenggaraan saliran serta tindakan segera kerajaan negeri.

Pengerusi Jawatankuasa Kanan Perumahan, Kerajaan Tempatan, Saliran, Perubahan Iklim dan Pengurusan Bencana negeri, Datuk Rais Yasin berkata, pengurangan sebanyak 22 hotspot itu membuktikan usaha yang dilaksanakan kerajaan negeri bersama agensi berkaitan mula membuahkan hasil. 

Bagaimanapun, katanya, jumlah hot spot berkenaan boleh kembali meningkat sekiranya pembangunan tidak dikawal dengan baik, terutama projek yang gagal mengambil kira kapasiti sistem saliran sedia ada.

“Dulu kita ada 124 hot spot banjir, sekarang hanya tinggal 102 hotspot yang masih dikenal pasti.

“Ini menunjukkan segala usaha yang dilaksanakan kerajaan negeri telah memberi kesan positif, namun hotspot boleh bertambah semula jika pembangunan tidak dirancang dengan baik,” katanya kepada pemberita pada sidang akhbar selepas Persidangan Dewan Undangan Negeri (DUN) Melaka di Seri Negeri, Ayer Keroh di sini, hari ini. 

Sebelum ini, kerajaan negeri turut menyatakan akan mengkaji penyelesaian jangka panjang bagi menangani masalah banjir yang membelenggu beberapa kawasan di negeri ini sejak lebih 30 tahun lalu, susulan kejadian hujan luar biasa yang mengakibatkan banjir di tiga daerah baru-baru ini.

Rais berkata, antara faktor utama yang menyumbang kepada kejadian banjir ialah pembangunan di kawasan tanah tinggi yang menyebabkan aliran air menghala ke kawasan penempatan di bahagian bawah. – KOSMO! ONLINE 

Melaka umum mangsa banjir dikecualikan bayar bil air Julai

AYER KEROH: Semua keluarga yang dikenal pasti terjejas akibat banjir di Melaka, baru-baru ini, dikecualikan pembayaran bil air bagi penggunaan bulan ini sebagai tanda keprihatinan kerajaan negeri kepada mereka.

Ketua Menteri, Datuk Seri Ab Rauf Yusoh, berkata inisiatif menerusi Bantuan Khas Melaka Sayang Rakyat (MeSRa) itu membabitkan kos kira-kira RM50,000.

Katanya, ia bakal memberi manfaat kepada 327 keluarga, namun jumlah penerima itu mungkin berubah mengikut laporan dan proses pendaftaran yang sedang dikemas kini.

Justeru, beliau mengarahkan pihak bertanggungjawab seperti jabatan berkaitan serta Jawatankuasa Pembangunan dan Keselamatan Kampung (JPKK) supaya mempermudah serta mempercepatkan pelaksanaan bantuan itu tanpa membebankan mangsa dengan kerenah birokrasi.

Beliau berkata, keluarga yang sudah dikenal pasti sebagai mangsa banjir tidak sepatutnya melalui pelbagai proses bagi membuktikan kelayakan mereka menerima bantuan.

"Kerajaan negeri amat memahami kesukaran dihadapi keluarga yang terjejas akibat banjir.

"Sehubungan itu, saya mengumumkan pemberian bil air percuma bagi penggunaan Julai ini kepada mangsa banjir," katanya pada sidang media selepas menghadiri sidang Dewan Undangan Negeri (DUN) Melaka, hari ini.

Sementara itu dalam perkembangan lain, Ab Rauf berkata, Kerajaan Melaka akan menghadiahkan kemasukan percuma ke beberapa lokasi produk pelancongan terpilih di negeri ini kepada orang ramai sempena sambutan Hari Kebangsaan pada 31 Ogos depan.

Beliau berkata, inisiatif itu bukan saja akan dinikmati rakyat Melaka, malah turut terbuka kepada semua pelancong di negeri ini pada tarikh berkenaan.

"Ini sebagai tanda penghargaan kerajaan negeri kepada rakyat dan pelancong yang memilih Melaka sebagai destinasi kunjungan mereka.

"Bagaimanapun, senarai lokasi terbabit dalam program khas itu akan dimaklumkan sedikit masa lagi.

"Ia dijangka membabitkan beberapa tarikan utama seperti Menara Taming Sari, Melaka River Cruise, Zoo Melaka serta beberapa muzium terpilih," katanya.

Penafian
Kerajaan Malaysia dan Agensi Pengurusan Bencana Negara (NADMA) tidak bertanggungjawab di atas kehilangan atau kerosakan disebabkan penggunaan mana-mana maklumat yang diperolehi daripada laman web ini.
Hubungi Kami
Agensi Pengurusan Bencana Negara (NADMA),
Jabatan Perdana Menteri,
Aras B1, 6 dan 7, Setia Perkasa 5,
Kompleks Setia Perkasa,
Pusat Pentadbiran Kerajaan Persekutuan,
62502 WP Putrajaya

T: +603 8870 4800
F: +603 8870 4848
E: admin@nadma.gov.my
G: 2.937323, 101.704762
Statistik Pengunjung

Search