JEREBU yang kembali melanda beberapa kawasan Malaysia baru-baru ini memberikan gambaran jelas tentang kepentingan pemantauan berasaskan teknologi.
Kita tidak boleh hanya bergantung kepada keadaan langit untuk menentukan tahap pencemaran. Udara yang kelihatan sedikit berkabus mungkin mempunyai kandungan zarah halus yang memberi risiko kepada kesihatan.
Malaysia sebenarnya telah mempunyai sistem pemantauan kualiti alam sekitar melalui Jabatan Alam Sekitar (JAS). Program Pengawasan Kualiti Alam Sekitar merangkumi pengumpulan data kualiti udara, air sungai dan air marin.
Sistem ini juga berfungsi sebagai mekanisme amaran awal terhadap kejadian pencemaran seperti jerebu.
Internet Kebendaan (IoT), misalnya, membolehkan sensor dipasang di pelbagai lokasi untuk mengumpul data persekitaran secara berterusan.
Sensor kualiti udara boleh mengesan perubahan bahan pencemar tertentu. Sensor cuaca pula boleh mengukur suhu, kelembapan dan arah angin.
Data ini boleh digabungkan dengan maklumat satelit, imej dron serta rekod sejarah untuk menghasilkan gambaran yang lebih menyeluruh mengenai sesuatu kawasan.
Kecerdasan buatan atau AI boleh digunakan untuk menganalisis data dalam jumlah yang besar di mana AI boleh membantu mengenal pasti pola perubahan dan memberikan maklumat sokongan kepada pihak berkuasa untuk membuat keputusan lebih pantas.
Dalam konteks jerebu, pemantauan tidak seharusnya berhenti selepas bacaan indeks pencemaran udara (IPU) meningkat. Data boleh digunakan untuk mengenal pasti kawasan yang berpotensi terjejas berdasarkan arah angin, lokasi titik panas dan keadaan cuaca.
Maklumat tersebut kemudiannya boleh membantu merancang tindakan mitigasi. Mitigasi bermaksud mengurangkan kesan bencana sebelum keadaan menjadi lebih buruk.
Sekiranya bacaan pencemaran meningkat, aktiviti luar boleh dikurangkan mengikut prosedur standard (SOP) yang ditetapkan. Institusi pendidikan boleh menyesuaikan aktiviti mengikut tahap risiko dan masyarakat boleh mengambil langkah perlindungan yang bersesuaian.
Dalam keadaan tertentu, pihak berkuasa juga boleh meningkatkan pemantauan serta menggerakkan agensi berkaitan.
Pada masa sama, teknologi boleh digunakan untuk memantau bencana lain seperti banjir, tanah runtuh, kebakaran hutan dan pencemaran air. Sensor paras air boleh memberi amaran apabila sungai meningkat secara luar biasa.
Sensor pergerakan tanah pula berpotensi membantu memantau kawasan cerun berisiko. Kamera dan dron boleh digunakan untuk memerhatikan kawasan yang sukar dimasuki manusia, khususnya ketika operasi mencari dan menyelamat.
Namun begitu, teknologi bukanlah penyelesaian mutlak. Sistem pemantauan yang canggih tidak akan banyak membantu jika data tidak diterjemahkan kepada tindakan.
Justeru, langkah pencegahan perlu berjalan seiring dengan pembangunan teknologi semasa. Masyarakat perlu faham, dididik supaya memahami maksud bacaan IPU, amaran bencana dan arahan pihak berkuasa.
Sekolah, komuniti dan organisasi juga wajar melaksanakan latihan kesiapsiagaan secara berkala.
Pihak berkuasa pula perlu memastikan sensor dan peralatan pemantauan sentiasa diselenggara dengan baik. Infrastruktur komunikasi perlu mempunyai sistem sokongan sekiranya berlaku gangguan.
Data yang dikumpulkan juga perlu diselaraskan antara agensi supaya tindakan dapat dibuat berdasarkan maklumat yang konsisten.
Apa yang penting, kita perlu mengubah pendekatan daripada bertindak selepas bencana kepada bersedia sebelum bencana.
Jerebu memberikan satu pengajaran penting. Kita tidak seharusnya menunggu langit menjadi kelabu, jarak penglihatan semakin pendek atau masyarakat mula mengalami kesukaran bernafas sebelum mengambil tindakan. – UTUSAN
PROFESOR MADYA TS. DR. MUHAMAD SAUFI CHE RUSULI
Kelayakan profesional dalam pengurusan bencana Universiti Melbourne
When haze crosses borders, can the law follow? — Mohd Zulfakar Mohd Nawi and Redza Zakaria
- Admin UKK
- Berita
OCTOBER 16 — Malaysia presents a striking statutory paradox when responding to seasonal haze pollution: the nation possesses a comprehensive, highly punitive domestic environmental legal framework, yet remains entirely powerless against atmospheric smoke originating beyond its borders.
Grounding environmental protection within constitutional jurisprudence is essential, as it establishes an unshakeable bedrock for public rights claims that elevates clean air from a regulatory ideal to a fundamental human right.
The legal foundation for environmental rights in Malaysia originates from Article 5(1) of the Federal Constitution, which mandates that no person shall be deprived of their life save in accordance with law.
In the landmark Court of Appeal decision of Tan Tek Seng v Suruhanjaya Perkhidmatan Pendidikan (1996), the judiciary expansively interpreted the term “life” to encompass all elements that constitute a person’s quality of life.
This precedent has since been established as the legal authority for a constitutional right to live in a reasonably healthy, pollution-free environment.
The practical application of this constitutional principle was demonstrated in 2024 when the Johor Bahru High Court doubled the fine for a company responsible for air pollution in Pasir Gudang to RM80,000 per charge, explicitly citing Article 5 and observing that it guarantees a healthy quality of life.
That same year, the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (Suhakam) published a dedicated report examining haze pollution through the lens of the right to clean air.
The primary statutory instrument for domestic environmental enforcement is the Environmental Quality Act 1974 (Act 127). Following legislative amendments gazetted on June 6, 2024, and brought into force on July 7, 2024, Parliament amended 28 sections of Act 127, elevating maximum penalties up to RM10 million for severe offences.
To combat atmospheric haze, Section 29A of Act 127 strictly prohibits open burning.
Under the revised penalties, convicted offenders face fines ranging between RM25,000 and RM1 million, imprisonment for terms up to five years, or both.
Furthermore, administrative compounds can now be issued for up to half the maximum statutory fine.
This represents a significant shift from the previous compound baseline of approximately RM2,000, which polluters routinely treated as a mere operational cost cheaper than clearing land by machine.
Section 29A also imposes explicit legal liability on landowners to prevent trespassers from starting fires on their property.
This statutory framework is reinforced by the Environmental Quality (Clean Air) Regulations 2014, which regulate emissions from industrial premises and factories.
In Sarawak — the state most severely impacted by seasonal haze — the Natural Resources and Environment Ordinance 1993 provides the state government with localised environmental regulatory powers.
According to Rosli Zul, Director of the Department of Environment’s Enforcement Division, open burning accounts for nearly 80 per cent of all environmental complaints received annually, prompting intensified enforcement action nationwide.
While these robust domestic environmental statutes establish stringent air quality standards within national borders, public institutions and duty-bearers still face immense administrative and operational hurdles when severe pollution episodes disrupt critical social and economic sectors.
The transboundary jurisdictional deficit and proposals for reform
The fundamental structural flaw in Malaysia’s legal response to haze is territoriality.
Territorial legislation cannot cross international borders to stop transboundary atmospheric pollution, necessitating extra-territorial corporate accountability mechanisms.
The strict territorial limitation of Act 127 allows Malaysian authorities to penalise illegal land clearing in Kuala Langat or Bachok, but leaves them powerless against peat fires burning in Kalimantan, even when those agricultural operations are backed or controlled by Malaysian capital.
The smoke that forced the closure of 710 schools in Sarawak requires no passport to cross international boundaries.
This jurisdictional void has driven recurring calls for a Transboundary Haze Pollution Act.
Following the severe 2019 haze crisis, the Academy of Sciences Malaysia was tasked with studying the feasibility of a transboundary pollution legal framework.
The Cabinet approved the introduction of such a bill on February 12, 2020, but the legislative initiative was shelved following a change in government.
In 2023, the government maintained that the option remained under consideration.
By 2024, the incumbent minister argued that enforcing such a law without bilateral agreements posed insurmountable jurisdictional hurdles.
On September 25, the ministry confirmed it had reopened studies into dedicated transboundary legislation, with the minister directing a special committee to conduct an investigation.
Dr G. Pubadi, Undersecretary of the Ministry’s Environmental Management Division, acknowledged that drafting extra-territorial legislation presents complex legal challenges.
To overcome these legal hurdles, future legislation must strategically draw a distinction between extraterritorial in rem land management and in personam regulatory leverage over domestic corporate parents.
Seeking in rem jurisdiction over foreign physical property or foreign sovereign land-use decisions invites legitimate diplomatic resistance regarding state sovereignty.
Conversely, exercising in personam jurisdiction over parent entities registered, listed, or operating within Malaysia is well within established administrative and corporate legal norms.
By embedding mandatory disclosure rules — such as requiring Bursa Malaysia-listed conglomerates to publish detailed maps of foreign agricultural concessions, active fire hotspot data, and foreign subsidiary burn records — Malaysia can exert formidable economic, market, and regulatory pressure without infringing on foreign territorial sovereignty.
Additional legal reform proposals put forward by civil society groups include amending Article 5(1) of the Federal Constitution to explicitly recognise the right to a safe, clean, and healthy environment, as well as enacting a comprehensive clean air act.
Concurrently, the Education Ministry could elevate its haze guidelines into enforceable administrative regulations that prescribe mandatory minimum indoor air quality standards for classrooms.
The arrival of the northeast monsoon around mid-October typically clears the immediate skies.
However, until Malaysia enacts legislative reforms capable of addressing cross-border pollution, every dry season will bring the same public health crisis and the same jurisdictional limits.
* Dr Mohd Zulfakar Mohd Nawi is a Senior Lecturer at the Department of Professional Education and Postgraduates, Faculty of Technical and Vocational Education, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM). Redza Zakaria is the Head Unit of Maritime Law, Policy and Governance at the Institute of Ocean and Earth Sciences (IOES), Senior Lecturer at the Faculty of Law, Universiti Malaya, and a member of the Group of Experts for the Ocean Literacy (WESTPAC) under Unesco.
Mohamad Hasan says diplomacy first in haze crisis, warns enforcement risks severing Indonesia ties
- Admin UKK
- Berita
SEREMBAN, Oct 16 — Malaysia will continue to use diplomatic channels and Asean mechanisms to address the transboundary haze issue with Indonesia through a phased approach that prioritises its people’s interests and health, without jeopardising bilateral relations, said Foreign Minister Datuk Seri Mohamad Hasan.
He said discussions between leaders and regional channels are the preferred approaches to addressing sensitive issues involving neighbouring countries, rather than legal enforcement measures or the issuance of diplomatic notes.
“We have not reached that stage yet. It is easy to talk about taking legal enforcement action, but doing so would mean we were prepared to sever relations.
“We have not reached that point, so there is no need to issue a diplomatic note. Such a note is a last resort,” he told reporters after presenting contributions to senior citizens and assistance for further studies in the Rembau parliamentary constituency here yesterday.
He said Malaysia’s position does not mean the government is doing nothing about the persistent haze, but that it is pursuing a more comprehensive approach to finding a joint regional solution while remaining ready to help Indonesia tackle the fires responsible for the haze.
“I have instructed the Foreign Ministry’s secretary-general to take this up, and was informed yesterday that a coordination meeting will be held to discuss how Malaysia can help Indonesia tackle the fires. The Indonesian government is making concerted efforts to put them out, but the task is not easy,” he said.
Mohamad said the Japanese assistance team had also been forced to pull out because of difficulties accessing the fire sites.
“Our helicopters cannot operate either, as the haze is so thick that flying would be dangerous,” he said, adding that visibility is less than 50 metres, making flying extremely dangerous.
In a related development, Mohamad said Malaysia will submit a non-paper at the upcoming Asean Senior Officials’ Meeting and Asean Foreign Ministers’ Meeting as part of efforts to strengthen regional mechanisms to address transboundary haze.
The move also aims to enable the haze issue to be discussed within the natural disasters framework, he said, paving the way for Asean to strengthen its regional response and cooperation.
The media had previously reported that Malaysia would raise the issue of transboundary haze at the Asean Foreign Ministers’ Meeting ahead of the 49th Asean Summit in Manila, the Philippines, next month, to discuss more effective regional mechanisms to address the problem. — Bernama
JAKARTA: Penduduk di wilayah Kalimantan Barat, Indonesia hilang sabar kerana terpaksa berdepan kebakaran hutan sehingga mengeluarkan jerebu beracun yang menyebabkan penyakit, memaksa sekolah ditutup dan menjejaskan kegiatan ekonomi.
Selama beberapa minggu, masyarakat di Kalimantan Barat bertungkus-lumus memadamkan kebakaran sehingga memusnahkan kawasan tanah yang luas dan mencemarkan udara sehingga ke Malaysia dan Singapura.
Kerajaan mengerahkan anggota bomba dengan bantuan sukarelawan ke kawasan terjejas, selain melaksanakan pembenihan awan dan operasi pengeboman air tetapi usaha itu hanya membuahkan hasil yang terhad.
Seorang penduduk, Sisilius Rami berkata kepada AFP berkata, jerebu menjejaskan setiap aspek kehidupan seharian, termasuk mengganggu persekolahan dan aktiviti luar, antaranya kegiatan pertanian.
“Kanak-kanak berhak mendapat pendidikan. Masyarakat berhak menjalani kehidupan yang sihat. Kerajaan sepatutnya hadir untuk menjamin hak itu, bukannya membiarkan rakyat menanggung kesannya sendiri.
“Kerajaan mempunyai sumber dan kemudahan yang jauh lebih mencukupi berbanding masyarakat. Namun, di lapangan, penduduk yang berjuang dengan kemampuan terhad,” katanya di kediamannya di Pontianak, bandar yang diselubungi jerebu.
Saman itu turut menyasarkan 26 pegawai daripada kerajaan pusat, wilayah dan tempatan, selain pihak polis serta perkhidmatan kecemasan.
Prosiding mahkamah seterusnya dijadualkan berlangsung pada 21 Oktober.
Sebuah pertubuhan bukan kerajaan masyarakat peribumi dikenali sebagai AMAN yang turut menjadi plaintif berkata, terlalu banyak tanggungjawab memadamkan kebakaran diletakkan di bahu penduduk yang hanya mempunyai peralatan terhad, termasuk hos air untuk menyiram taman dan pelitup muka pembedahan.
“Jika kerajaan benar-benar serius mahu memadamkan kebakaran, jerebu pasti sudah tiada lagi,” kata wakil AMAN, Tono, yang seperti kebanyakan rakyat Indonesia hanya menggunakan satu nama. – AFP
Rumah hanya tinggal semeter dari laut
- Admin UKK
- Berita
KUALA NERUS – Kira-kira 11 tahun lalu pesisir pantai terletak ratusan meter dari belakang rumah penduduk Kampung Tanjung, Batu Rakit, di sini, namun fenomena hakisan pantai saban tahun ketika Monsun Timur Laut (MTL) mengakibatkan jarak tersebut tinggal kira-kira semeter.
MTL yang dijangka tiba kurang dua minggu lagi membuatkan penduduk tidak lena tidur, malan pokok kelapa di belakang rumah yang menjadi ‘benteng’ pun sudah mula menyembah bumi serta terendam air laut.
Seorang penduduk, Miasni Ab. Wahab, 38, berkata, sebelum ini, tiga rumah jirannya dan surau kampung mereka sudah tenggelam menjadi sebahagian Laut China Selatan.
“Rumah saya sendiri dan kedai makan diusahakan kini hanya kira-kira semeter dari pesisir pantai.
“Sebagai perbandingan, jarak rumah dan kedai makan saya sejauh lebih 150 meter dari pantai kira-kira 11 tahun lalu,” katanya ketika ditemui di Kampung Tanjung, Batu Rakit, di sini semalam.
Kata Miasni, ketibaan MTL tidak lama lagi membuatkan dia dan ahli keluarga bimbang ancaman ombak besar meranapkan rumah dan kedai makannya.
Menurutnya, kebimbangan mereka berasas kerana surau yang terletak bersebelahan kedai makannya telah musnah akibat hakisan pantai pada musim tengkujuh tahun lalu.
Seorang lagi penduduk, Rohmah Abdul Ghani, 61, juga berasa bimbang kerana rumahnya yang terletak hanya beberapa meter dari pantai turut tidak mampu bertahan sekiranya berdepan ombak besar sepanjang MTL kelak.
“Sebelum ini, tiga rumah jiran saya sudah ditenggelami laut disebabkan hakisan pantai musim tengkujuh beberapa tahun sebelum ini.
“Hanya tinggal lima rumah termasuk milik keluarga saya dan Miasmi terletak berhampiran pesisir Pantai Tanjung masih bertahan.
“Seriusnya ancaman hakisan ini apabila anak-anak saya boleh memancing ikan di belakang rumah setiap kali pulang bercuti,” katanya.
Sehubungan itu, Rohmah mendesak pihak berwajib agar mengambil langkah segera bagi meminimumkan kesan hakisan musim tengkujuh tidak lama lagi. – KOSMO! ONLINE
